Device comprising thirteen products which gauge the feeling from contract to your mate toward basic circumstances on the dating
Childbearing Motivation Survey (CBQ) (Miller, 1995). Device including 47 affairs divided into several separate scales: Positive Childbirth Inspiration (PCM) and Bad Childbearing Determination (NCM). This new PCM size including 27 products will bring a complete PCM get into the four classes, and this explain features of getting pupils: (1) delights of being pregnant, birth, and you will youth, (2) traditional childbearing, (3) pleasure of raising a child, (4) effect needed and linked, and you can (5) important beliefs. The new NCM scale includes 20 products which will bring an overall NCM rating for the four categories, hence indicate disadvantages regarding childbirth: (1) problems during pregnancy and childbirth, (2) parental concerns and you can questions, (3) down sides out-of child care, and you can (4) parental be concerned. A good 4-part Likert-sorts of measure (4 = greatly, step 3 = reasonable, 2 = nothing, step 1 = not) can be used for this specific purpose. The procedure of interpretation and you will adaptation of the CBQ to own Brazil are did by Varas and you will Borsa (2019). The latest review from internal surface was performed because of the calculating brand new Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999), plus the after the abilities have been located: PCM level (? = .96) and you will NCM measure(? = .92).
Dyadic Consensus Scale (DCS) (Spanier, 1976, modified by the Hernandez, 2008). The scale demonstrated a keen Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999) out-of .89.
Appliance build because of it search, geared towards collecting socio-group and you will nearest and dearest pointers, eg physiological intercourse, age, place of quarters, money, knowledge, community, ong anybody else
Positivity scale (PS) (Casio, Souza, Koller, & C). An 7-item instrument you to definitely explores the fresh new respondent's self-confident viewpoint regarding the themselves/by herself in addition to coming. The shape demonstrated an Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999) regarding .86.
We incorporated heterosexual Brazilians of both genders as well as over this from 18
Survey on the Norwalk escort service event of religiosity (QER). Device put up for it analysis predicated on questions utilized in Miller and you can Pasta's browse (1995). It is comprising six items that concern the individuals participation within the spiritual methods plus the evaluation out-of spiritual precepts inside daily lifestyle choices. The scale exhibited a keen Omega coefficient ? (McDonald, 1999) regarding.89.
Nearest and dearest Assistance Effect Catalog (FSPI) (Baptista, 2005). Device comprising 42 items that assess three size of loved ones support: (1) affective-consistent (AC) including 21 facts, hence encompass items of value of your expression from love certainly one of members; (2) relatives version (FA) including 13 products that get when you look at the an upside-down styles proving the absence of type on the class and you can wondering negative thinking on the nearest and dearest; (3) autonomy (A), consisting of eight products which measure the relationships out-of believe, versatility and privacy among players. The brand new FSPI products shown the following Omega coefficients (McDonald, 1999): Air conditioning (? = .93), AF (? = .91) and An effective (? = .85).
Quicker Personality S) (Hauck Filho, Machado, Teixeira, Bandeira, 2012). Tool including twenty-five products which determine character in line with the Huge Five design: neuroticism (N), extroversion (E), socializing (S), conscientiousness (C), and you may openness to try out (OE). The brand new RPMS things showed another Omega coefficients (McDonald, 1999): N (? = .77), Age (? = .77), S (? = .73), C (? = .73) and OE (? = .61).
Data range. The participants was indeed hired compliment of social networking sites, making use of the snowball approach (Patton, 1990), in which they referred the study to their colleagues. Brand new different off non-heterosexual anybody comes from the reality that knowledge into CM through with this type of groups (Blake et al., 2017; van Houten, Tornello, Hoffenaar, & Bos, 2020) suggest the need to were and you may problematize a couple of private and you can contextual details, and that address questions novel on the intimate fraction standing, which were perhaps not felt within research. Research try amassed very nearly via the on the internet platform Surveymonkey, between .